Comments on: What’s up with the other model? http://www.opensamm.org/2009/03/whats-up-with-the-other-model/ A guide to building security into software development Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:18:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Pravir Chandra http://www.opensamm.org/2009/03/whats-up-with-the-other-model/comment-page-1/#comment-118 Pravir Chandra Sat, 11 Sep 2010 09:23:01 +0000 http://www.opensamm.org/?p=70#comment-118 That would be great if you guys wanted to write it up! Feel free to send drafts or ask questions on the mailing list, and we'll figure it out from there. That would be great if you guys wanted to write it up! Feel free to send drafts or ask questions on the mailing list, and we’ll figure it out from there.

]]> By: cmlh http://www.opensamm.org/2009/03/whats-up-with-the-other-model/comment-page-1/#comment-117 cmlh Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:55:16 +0000 http://www.opensamm.org/?p=70#comment-117 Justin Derry and I are presenting on OpenSAMM vs BSIMM1/2 in Sydney, Australia on 6 Oct 2010 - Further information at http://www.aisa.org.au/index.php?page=281 and http://events.linkedin.com/AISA-Sydney-Application-Security/pub/408209 Can you let me know if you would be interested in allowing the differences with BSIMM1/2 be contributed back to OpenSAMM rather then having you do this yourself? Justin Derry and I are presenting on OpenSAMM vs BSIMM1/2 in Sydney, Australia on 6 Oct 2010 – Further information at http://www.aisa.org.au/index.php?page=281 and http://events.linkedin.com/AISA-Sydney-Application-Security/pub/408209

Can you let me know if you would be interested in allowing the differences with BSIMM1/2 be contributed back to OpenSAMM rather then having you do this yourself?

]]> By: chandra http://www.opensamm.org/2009/03/whats-up-with-the-other-model/comment-page-1/#comment-9 chandra Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:40:38 +0000 http://www.opensamm.org/?p=70#comment-9 Good question. Even though it was funded by a vendor, it was built independently based on the collected experiences of myself and several other smart folks. We used no commercial proprietary terms and pay particular attention to language to make sure there was nothing slanted for (or against) any product or services vendor out there. But you be the judge for yourself -- if you see anything proprietary or slanted in SAMM, point it out and we'll fix it. Good question. Even though it was funded by a vendor, it was built independently based on the collected experiences of myself and several other smart folks.
We used no commercial proprietary terms and pay particular attention to language to make sure there was nothing slanted for (or against) any product or services vendor out there. But you be the judge for yourself — if you see anything proprietary or slanted in SAMM, point it out and we’ll fix it.

]]> By: R. Stevens http://www.opensamm.org/2009/03/whats-up-with-the-other-model/comment-page-1/#comment-8 R. Stevens Mon, 09 Mar 2009 11:42:21 +0000 http://www.opensamm.org/?p=70#comment-8 I am confused, how can a model be vendor neutral if from it's infancy was funded by one of the vendors in this space "Fortify". I am confused, how can a model be vendor neutral if from it’s infancy was funded by one of the vendors in this space “Fortify”.

]]>