http://www.opensamm.org/2009/03/whats-up-with-the-other-model/ A guide to building security into software development Sun, 22 Aug 2010 05:40:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 http://www.opensamm.org/2009/03/whats-up-with-the-other-model/comment-page-1/#comment-9 chandra Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:40:38 +0000 http://www.opensamm.org/?p=70#comment-9 Good question. Even though it was funded by a vendor, it was built independently based on the collected experiences of myself and several other smart folks. We used no commercial proprietary terms and pay particular attention to language to make sure there was nothing slanted for (or against) any product or services vendor out there. But you be the judge for yourself -- if you see anything proprietary or slanted in SAMM, point it out and we'll fix it. Good question. Even though it was funded by a vendor, it was built independently based on the collected experiences of myself and several other smart folks.
We used no commercial proprietary terms and pay particular attention to language to make sure there was nothing slanted for (or against) any product or services vendor out there. But you be the judge for yourself — if you see anything proprietary or slanted in SAMM, point it out and we’ll fix it.

]]> http://www.opensamm.org/2009/03/whats-up-with-the-other-model/comment-page-1/#comment-8 R. Stevens Mon, 09 Mar 2009 11:42:21 +0000 http://www.opensamm.org/?p=70#comment-8 I am confused, how can a model be vendor neutral if from it's infancy was funded by one of the vendors in this space "Fortify". I am confused, how can a model be vendor neutral if from it’s infancy was funded by one of the vendors in this space “Fortify”.

]]>